State says Miami father’s risk to ‘burn’ college over masks regulations wasn’t literal, drops case

Prosecutors gained’t press fees towards a father who were accused of short of to “burn” down a Northeast Miami-Dade Jewish college on an anti-mask workforce textual content.

The state introduced Wednesday it dropped the case towards Mark Polyakov, who’d been arrested closing 12 months on a prison fee of issuing a written risk towards the Scheck Hillel Neighborhood College.

In line with Miami-Dade police, he used to be indignant as a result of his 4-year-old son used to be pressured to put on a masks on an athletic box. In a bunch chat with oldsters referred to as “Not more mask Hillel,” he allegedly wrote: “I wish to burn this college to the … flooring! That is what they’re doing out of doors forcing … mask 80 levels. You’ll’t be great will get you nowhere.”

He later wrote: “I simply were given kicked out of Hillel. I will be able to burn this college down.”

His son, Samuel, used to be expelled from the varsity and he used to be banned from college belongings.

However consistent with Polyakov and his lawyers, he intended he sought after to head after the varsity in a criminal sense — as in record a lawsuit towards the varsity, which billed itself as mask-optional. Masks mandates to give protection to towards COVID-19 in colleges had been a sizzling button factor in Florida, the place Gov. Ron DeSantis has even chided highschool scholars about dressed in them.

Polyakov’s protection used to be sponsored up by way of different messages within the textual content thread, Assistant State Legal professional Sophiea Bailey wrote in a last memo at the case. “The defendant clarified later within the thread that he intended to legally burn down the varsity,” she wrote.

See also  College repairs employee stole scholar drugs from nurse’s administrative center, IL officers say

His protection legal professional, Mark Eiglarsh, mentioned Polyakov’s arrest were “unwarranted.”

“By way of studying all of my shopper’s messages in context, it’s transparent that his sole intent used to be ‘burn down the varsity’ by way of taking criminal motion and now not by way of committing an act of arson,” Eiglarsh mentioned.